Trying my hand at condoms
Annie Dillard wrote an essay about talent that begins with a couple paradoxes I haven't yet figured out. She says there is no such thing as talent; and if there is, it is in fields such as math and music and chess. She says that apart from Mozart and a few others, there have never been and never will be any truly gifted children. I suppose her use of absolute contradictions rankles me because I am so fond of the way of the gray, that happy watery world where nothing quite is or isn't.
Two things from her essay speak the truth to me. The first is that all of us are uninspired lumps of clay. The second is that we all have an equal capacity for creating and are called to create.
Annie describes people asking her about how she writes: their eyes are wide open as if they are addressing a majestic glacier or some other singular natural wonder. They cannot imagine that she simply sits down and does it; they think she must have a trick, a muse they have never known, a calling they have never heard. "Obviously this is your special gift. You have to write. I wish something in my life compelled and inspired me so directly." By making her into an anomaly, they give themselves permission to remain ordinary.
I met with a sweet soul (strong but brittle plastic like me) this weekend. We talked about the importance of courageous living, and we talked about writing. She asked me about how I structured writing time, and I told her I had to place it first thing in the morning, and that I had to treat it as I do my flute and piano practice: "This is something I want to do and like to do, and I've got to set aside time for it." "Ah," she said, "so you have learned how to discipline yourself through your musical background." I decided to agree but tried to downplay any feeling that dedicating thirty minutes each morning was an accomplishment.
Later I had to disagree directly, though gently. A couple years ago, when we were just getting to be friendly, she invited me to a Christmas party that she was throwing at her home for her writing group. At the time, I was not an artist or a poet or a writer or a pianist; I was a video store clerk. I was He Who Flees His Home and Wanders Wide Eyed at the Edge of the World. She introduced me to everyone as a "sensitive local." I sat and watched as the meeting progressed, enjoying these people talk about their creative art (though disturbed by how many people used the same line for praise for their prose: "I found it very engaging), but feeling completely foreign to them, as if they had been discussing the Balinese art of legong. I had written a few love- and lust-inspired demipoems in a notebook—hell, I'd written poems and stories as a youngster and had been in grad school in English for a semester and a half—but I still felt fundamentally different from the people gathered together here as writers.
But these were not true writers, as my friend discovered. She found a new literary community, and unlike the folks at the Christmas party, these new people are not simply "trying their hand at writing" but are different: they are "deeply in love with the word." There is some truth, surely. The first group consisted of people who came together by taking a class for beginning writers; the second group consists of people who publish small and rub elbows with people who publish large.
But the danger is too great: What happens is that we begin to think that we either are or are not something or other, and that doing things does not change us. The first group consisted of accountants who do a bit of writing, and the second group consists of writers who do a bit of real estate (or what have you).
In fact, doing things does change us. It makes lines on our bodies, builds furrows in our brains, and changes the beating of our hearts. Over beer in a hidden dive, a new friend asked, "Do you paint?" I laughed. It was a preposterous but fateful question. "No! Why? Do you?" And his face came alive as he told me his wife had just bought him a kit with canvases and acrylics, and he had watched in amazement as his body responded to the medium and made what he could never have anticipated and what was never there before. And how already he could not wait to begin the second painting of his life the next day.
"It is not good," he says. "But it's fun."
You're creating something that never was; you do it with joy. It is good. How could it not be?



